🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial action to restrict social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate worldwide. Lawmakers, campaigners, and guardians are watching with great interest to see if this tactic will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

The European Movement

Throughout Europe, a growing chorus of nations are exploring parallel restrictions.

• The Danish government has announced a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the PM arguing that mobile devices and networks are "robbing our children's childhood". A law may be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to protect young people from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is introducing a online verification tool to confirm the age and identity of social media participants. The media minister have indicated that an Australia-style ban remains "one of the measures on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has called on the legislature to enact a bill raising the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has recommended a related step, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The administration in the Netherlands has urged families to block their kids from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has approved a advisory resolution supporting a ban for under-16s unless a parent decides otherwise is given. While it cautions of the "addictive" design of these services, the move does not create binding law.

"An effective age limit is a useful first step," commented the MEP driving the measure.

Britain: A Watchful Eye

For the United Kingdom, the administration has kept open a potential ban, arguing that "no measure is being dismissed" but stressing any decision must be "supported by robust data".

Last year, interest built behind a legislative effort to impose restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was in the end modified. However, the administration vowed to further research the topic.

Campaign organizations have raised concerns. One foundation founded by the loved ones of a girl who was lost after encountering disturbing online content contends that a blanket age ban might not improve online safety and could create a "dangerous transition" of harm when young people turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to create products and services that are safe and age appropriate for young users," stated a prominent peer.

The United States: A State-by-State Landscape

Across America, regulation is largely happening at the local government level against a backdrop of federal inaction.

• Utah requires adult approval for minors to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has signed a bill banning those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a regulation restricting teenagers to one hour of social media use per day, with additional use dependent on parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced bills demanding parental consent for teenagers to open social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and calls from various politicians to mimic the Australian path, a US-wide ban is currently seen as improbable.

International Views

Outside of these regions, additional states are also taking action.

• The Malaysian government plans to restrict social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

However, world organizations strike a more cautious tone. The UN children's agency has cautioned that social media bans have downsides and "might have unintended consequences". The agency notes that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for marginalized young people and that government action should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to improve user protection.

While this global discussion unfolds, the steps of Australia and several other countries indicate that states globally are increasingly content to stand by for the industry to act voluntarily.