🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to resume atomic talks with the United States on condition that it is treated with "respect" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has announced.

Abbas Araghchi declared exclusively dialogue was effective, and revealed recent overtures had originated from intermediaries to restart negotiations with the Trump administration. He claimed Iran had zero secret atomic facilities, and Iran had not yet reached a point to allow the International Atomic Energy Agency to access struck enrichment centers for security reasons.

Walking a Challenging Route

The foreign minister is walking a difficult route since Iran wishes not to be seen to be proceeding from a position of disadvantage, and he consistently maintained that Iran had arisen more resilient militarily and mentally from the Israeli-US attack on its enrichment centers in June.

He was addressing at a defense forum in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to refine atomic fuel within its borders that it will always maintain" – the main reason of the stalemate in the earlier negotiations.

Previous Talks Abruptly Concluded

The prior phases of discussions between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and hostile conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with US support, attacked Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that concluded with Donald Trump claiming the facilities had been destroyed. Following this, Western states employed their right to reinstate global restrictions, but Iran maintains they have not had a major impact.

Magic Solution Offered

Iranian officials claimed they felt they had achieved a "perfect agreement" to the enrichment issue in earlier negotiations, when it was agreed an Iran-based consortium with Washington's engagement could process nuclear material. Both sides would have been able to declare success since home-based processing would have continued and the US could be assured that Iran's enrichment initiative was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been agreed in the discussions that American atomic experts could work within Iranian territory, but that was a logical implication of the cooperative offer. Diplomats claimed three times they had reached agreement with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to collapse due to "spoilers in Washington".

Present Situation

Iranian officials stated the partnership proposal was now no longer available, but it seems very probable the offer could be reintroduced in certain ways if talks reopen.

The American leader in recent days said he had been getting signals that Iran desired to resume discussions, but in private Tehran representatives state they are not yet getting consistent overtures from America either explicitly or from key regional mediators, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been criticized of inactivity in the face of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran says dialogue is not part of a show.

Political Stance

In his remarks to the conference, intended to paint the US as a hegemonic power that abuses the concept of global regulations, Araghchi declared the fortnight-long engagement demonstrated the conflict could not be settled by military means. He said the assaults commenced with a Washington's ultimatum for an total Iran submission and ended with an unconditional call for a truce.

Iran is assured the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were executed with total Washington understanding and collaboration, making trust difficult to reestablish.

Dialogue Continues the Final Answer

Araghchi stated: "Tehran was not the one that had fled negotiations; it was the United States and the Western nations that had repeatedly sought to dictate their desires during the talks. Dialogue can still be alive and remains the ultimate resolution to address conflicts, but its requirements, rules and fundamentals must be respected."

"In case they speak to the nation of Iran with the approach of dignity and honor, they will receive a reply in the identical language."

Restoration and Recovery

In what is characterized by Iran's diplomats as the struggle of repair and reconstruction, the foreign minister stated he was assured Iran's defence capabilities "have significantly improved than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been rebuilt. We gained many lessons from this conflict; we have come to know our personal limitations and the shortcomings of the enemy."

He added: "We managed to survive this war. Our enrichment knowledge, which they aimed to destroy, stays intact. The installations and equipment, if eliminated, will be rebuilt; what is crucial is the determination of the Iranian people and then the national cohesion that they aimed at, but were unable to shatter. The Iranian people have become more powerful, more cohesive, and more supportive of the administration and the state in the wake of this attack."